They Say if You Make It Past 9 Years Your Consider Family at This Point

Last night, one of my best friends chosen my cell phone twice in one minute—our signal for distress, the indication that I needed to pick upwardly the telephone right then, even if I was in the middle of dinner. I'd gotten previous distress calls when she establish a suspicious lump (the biopsy was, give thanks goodness, benign) and when her daughter was in an accident. I knew that any was coming on the other line wasn't adept.

"He is SO MEAN TO ME," she sobbed into the phone. "It'southward the same crap twelvemonth after year after year. I'g at that breaking point where it doesn't seem sane to go along to take it."

Oh male child: I hadn't seen that coming. This is the friend whose marriage sustains my (perhaps delusional) romantic conventionalities in union—the wedlock I point to as evidence that big dearest, deep connections, and truly equal partnerships are, in fact, possible.

Advertizing X

Simply here she was struggling with the same question I've wrestled with for years: is information technology amend for our kids if we stay in less-than-happy marriages?

Holy cow, is that a big question. And if you've ever seriously asked it, y'all know it can exist an agonizing one. In the coming weeks, I'll be blogging virtually how I've answered this question for myself.

I know it's tempting to answer the question of whether or not we should stay together for the kids with a simple "yes." As a society we tend to think that kids will do amend if parents stay together; that'due south what our grandparents' generation did, or tried to do. A mediocre marriage is better for kids than no union, correct? We might believe this at to the lowest degree partly considering of a hugely flawed—but very influential and well-publicized—study by Judith Wallerstein that "showed" that kids don't notice that their parents are unhappy in a marriage. Wallerstein argued that unless domestic violence is a part of the picture, kids are worse off when parents divorce.

Thinking that an unhappy matrimony is amend than no wedlock—whether the conventionalities comes from our family or religion or a study like Wallerstein's—has kept a lot of unhappily married Americans in their marriages. The study, past the way, while embraced by the press and published equally a New York Times-bestselling book, has been rejected whole-heartedly by social scientists because Wallerstein didn't use a random sample of families that had divorced or stayed married; instead, she looked at a group of divorced people with mental health problems. Her study doesn't meet accepted standards of scientific inquiry, and its findings shouldn't exist generalized to families that aren't struggling with the aforementioned things for which Wallerstein'south tiny sample was beingness treated (ordinarily histories of mental illness, clinical low, and suicidal tendencies).

Here is what I've gleaned from the many good studies I've read on the subject: It is the quality of parents' relationships with each other, rather than whether they are married or single, that matters nigh for kids' well-beingness. Parental conflict isn't good for children's happiness, whether or non you are married.

"Studies of ii-parent families have consistently found that when a couple's relationship is characterized by unresolved conflict and unhappiness, their children tend to have more than interim out aggressive behavior problems, more than shy withdrawn beliefs, and fewer social and academic skills," write UC Berkeley researchers Phil and Carolyn Cowan.

Furthermore, when couples aren't getting along, their irritation or acrimony with each other often spills over into their relationships with their children. "Some children get a double whammy," write the Cowans. They suffer the consequences of both the "heated or frosty emotional tone of their parents' relationship" and the frequent result of co-parent conflict—"harsh or ineffective patterns of caring and subject field."

I've lived this: When my husband and I would fight, I would have a difficult time managing the powerful negative emotions that surfaced—anger, disappointment, hurt—while trying to keep Fiona and Molly's routines on rails effectively. And I could usually win all the awards for crappy parenting if I likewise needed to handle a situation with the kids that required at-home, consequent discipline. When I'thou already upset, I tend to field of study the kids in a fashion that is, uh, non calm or collected.

So should y'all stay together for the kids? It depends on how high-conflict your matrimony is, how unhappy y'all are, and whether or not yous can fix these things.

© 2009 Christine Carter, Ph.D.

References:

Cowan, P.A., and C.P. Cowan. "Strengthening Couples to Ameliorate Children'southward Well-Existence: What Nosotros Know Now." Poverty Research News half dozen, no. iii (2002): 18-21.

Morrison, Donna Ruane, and Mary Jo Coiro. "Parental Conflict and Marital Disruption: Do Children Benefit When High-Conflict Marriages Are Dissolved?" Journal of Matrimony and the Family 61, no. iii (1999): 626-37.

Wallerstein, Judith S. The Unexpected Legacy of Divorce: The 25 Year Landmark Study. New York: Hyperion, 2001.

So many bloggers talk about this it is difficult to know where to beginning (wish I had time to read them all!). LousySpouse.com is kind of funny, though not too helpful. Penelope Torso cites the Wallerstein research like it is the last word; it isn't. Please advise other websites in the comments!

Join the Entrada for 100,000 Happier Parents by signing this unproblematic pledge.

Get a fan of Raising Happiness on Facebook.

Follow Christine Carter on Twitter

Subscribe to the Happiness Matters Podcast on iTunes.

Sign upwards for the Raising Happiness Course!

montgomerybutiou85.blogspot.com

Source: https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/should_we_stay_together_for_the_kids

Share this post